From: "Ludovic Brenta" <ludovic@ludovic-brenta.org>
Subject: Re: procedural vs object oriented
Date: 27 Apr 2006 05:03:31 -0700
Date: 2006-04-27T05:03:31-07:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1146139411.917269.308180@t31g2000cwb.googlegroups.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e2q8ln$m3i$1@sunnews.cern.ch>
Because:
* the dispatching logic is visible in the source and therefore easy to
trace to object code (you always certify the machine code, not the
source code).
* you see, at the call site, the complete list of possible call
targets.
Besides, peer review would reject your code. You should have used a
case statement with no "others" clause, and thought about all possible
shape types up-front.
--
Ludovic Brenta.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-04-27 12:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-04-26 8:16 procedural vs object oriented Ananth the Boss
2006-04-26 9:17 ` Jean-Pierre Rosen
2006-04-26 17:44 ` Jeffrey R. Carter
2006-04-26 12:52 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2006-04-27 1:33 ` bh
2006-04-27 5:22 ` Ludovic Brenta
2006-04-27 7:36 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2006-04-27 10:42 ` Ludovic Brenta
2006-04-27 11:07 ` Maciej Sobczak
2006-04-27 12:03 ` Ludovic Brenta [this message]
2006-04-27 17:19 ` Pascal Obry
2006-04-27 15:51 ` Georg Bauhaus
2006-04-27 12:45 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2006-04-27 13:20 ` Ludovic Brenta
2006-04-27 14:24 ` Alex R. Mosteo
2006-04-27 15:17 ` Ludovic Brenta
2006-04-27 16:11 ` Alex R. Mosteo
2006-04-27 20:19 ` Ludovic Brenta
2006-04-27 14:01 ` Jean-Pierre Rosen
2006-04-28 7:46 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2006-04-27 15:38 ` Peter Amey
2006-04-27 20:20 ` Ludovic Brenta
2006-04-27 6:55 ` Ananth the Boss
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox