From: "Ananth the Boss" <anboss@gmail.com>
Subject: where exactly c++,c fail and Ada gets thru'
Date: 23 Apr 2006 21:19:16 -0700
Date: 2006-04-23T21:19:16-07:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1145852356.559455.222600@i39g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> (raw)
we are developing safety critical software.my seniors say that c and
c++ are not suitable for safety critical software development and ada
is very much safe.NASA aslo uses Ada.at what point c++ or c turns to be
not suitable for devleloping flight software. i may be wrong also. can
any one give some more justifications for telling "ADA is safe" thanks
in advance
next reply other threads:[~2006-04-24 4:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-04-24 4:19 Ananth the Boss [this message]
2006-04-24 5:05 ` where exactly c++,c fail and Ada gets thru' jimmaureenrogers
2006-04-24 7:45 ` Ananth the Boss
2006-04-24 19:17 ` Martin Krischik
2006-04-24 20:23 ` Simon Wright
2006-04-24 22:34 ` Keith Thompson
2006-04-24 22:33 ` Keith Thompson
2006-04-25 5:23 ` Jeffrey R. Carter
2006-04-26 17:48 ` Martin Krischik
2006-04-26 19:33 ` Keith Thompson
2006-04-26 15:10 ` Maciej Sobczak
2006-04-26 17:32 ` Martin Krischik
2006-04-27 10:07 ` Maciej Sobczak
2006-04-27 21:19 ` Keith Thompson
2006-04-28 7:00 ` Martin Krischik
2006-04-28 12:27 ` Maciej Sobczak
2006-04-29 7:03 ` Martin Krischik
2006-04-29 14:08 ` REH
2006-05-01 10:20 ` Xcriber51
2006-05-01 13:55 ` REH
2006-05-02 6:43 ` Maciej Sobczak
2006-04-27 16:48 ` REH
2006-04-28 7:49 ` Martin Krischik
2006-04-28 11:17 ` REH
2006-04-29 6:47 ` Martin Krischik
2006-04-24 8:13 ` Rod Chapman
2006-04-25 1:57 ` Steve
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox