From: "Le" <snelson1@llnl.gov>
Subject: Re: Linux kernel bindings - at least sockets?
Date: 28 Mar 2006 10:36:56 -0800
Date: 2006-03-28T10:36:56-08:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1143571016.530657.325960@v46g2000cwv.googlegroups.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <m364ly7892.fsf@localhost.localdomain>
Thanks Mark. I initially rejected florist because I, probably
erroneously, saw a difference between the wrapping of VxWorks I/F in
our compiler vendors implementation and the Posix I/F in florist. Now
that I have the RFC, thanks to Jeffrey, I will be able to compare the
I/Fs and make a, hopefully, more judicious selection based on our new
target's sockets I/Fs.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-03-28 18:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-03-27 22:00 Linux kernel bindings - at least sockets? Le
2006-03-28 2:40 ` Jeffrey Creem
2006-03-28 18:30 ` Le
2006-03-29 19:59 ` Simon Wright
2006-03-28 18:07 ` Mark Lorenzen
2006-03-28 18:36 ` Le [this message]
2006-03-28 18:38 ` Le
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox