From: "bantchev@math.bas.bg" <bantchev@math.bas.bg>
Subject: Re: pointer to intrinsic function?
Date: 5 Mar 2006 05:04:58 -0800
Date: 2006-03-05T05:04:58-08:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1141563898.865365.200950@t39g2000cwt.googlegroups.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: dudc61$779$1@nwrdmz01.dmz.ncs.ea.ibs-infra.bt.com
Jim and Martin:
Thank you both for answering.
Martin Dowie wrote:
> In my experience the answer is "no" [see RM 6.3.1 (11)].
Yes, that seems to be the case. Thank you for pointing me
to this paragraph in the RM.
Jim Rogers wrote:
> Please explain your goals.
Martin Dowie wrote:
> Why are you worried about this?
Since I can do "+"(x,y) in place of x+y (and similarly for other
intrinsics) I thought I could store a pointer to "+" and use it to
the same effect that one would use sin'access etc -- which one
really can. Without that, I have to resort to either wrapping the
intrinsics or doing case analysis -- nothing really awful but still
vexing.
Cheers,
Boyko
prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-03-05 13:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-03-04 22:07 pointer to intrinsic function? bantchev
2006-03-05 0:08 ` jimmaureenrogers
2006-03-05 0:42 ` Martin Dowie
2006-03-05 13:04 ` bantchev [this message]
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox