From: "Matthew Heaney" <mheaney@on2.com>
Subject: Re: accessing record element (question to the pros)
Date: 28 Feb 2006 12:02:44 -0800
Date: 2006-02-28T12:02:44-08:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1141156964.771409.28180@v46g2000cwv.googlegroups.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1704363.KA6FmlD55X@linux1.krischik.com>
Martin Krischik wrote:
> And if you still want to do it: The newest GNAT has pragma Unchecked_Union.
> You find a description in the texts above.
Yes, but realize that that pragma is now officially part of Ada 2005.
It's true the GNAT has it, but I don't think even GNAT supports what's
described in RM05. (But I could be wrong. All compilers differ in how
much of Ada 2005 they support today.)
prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-02-28 20:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-02-24 15:03 accessing record element (question to the pros) Norbert Caspari
2006-02-24 15:27 ` Peter Hermann
2006-02-24 17:07 ` Norbert Caspari
2006-02-24 17:08 ` Alex R. Mosteo
2006-02-24 18:02 ` Jeffrey R. Carter
2006-02-24 19:04 ` Simon Wright
2006-02-24 21:46 ` Randy Brukardt
2006-02-26 11:49 ` many thanks to all the people who give me useful hints! Norbert Caspari
2006-02-28 0:33 ` Randy Brukardt
2006-02-24 18:32 ` accessing record element (question to the pros) Martin Krischik
2006-02-28 20:02 ` Matthew Heaney [this message]
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox