From: "john Doef" <john_doef@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: Records that could be arrays
Date: 23 Feb 2006 00:21:26 -0800
Date: 2006-02-23T00:21:26-08:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1140682886.120718.314010@g43g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <WBaLf.18619$HU.13588@trnddc04>
Justin Gombos a écrit :
> I noticed this example code in 5.4.4 of the Ada Quality and Style
> Guide:
[...]
> can be more expressive with an array. Example- there are more options
> when it comes to an arrays role in control structures. Plus the
> "others =>" notation is available. Thoughts?
"others =>" is availabe for records too.
JD.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-02-23 8:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-02-23 4:11 Records that could be arrays Justin Gombos
2006-02-23 4:51 ` tmoran
2006-02-23 13:19 ` Justin Gombos
2006-02-24 10:19 ` Stephen Leake
2006-02-23 6:32 ` Wilhelm Spickermann
2006-02-23 13:08 ` Stephen Leake
2006-02-23 13:20 ` Justin Gombos
2006-02-23 14:29 ` Wilhelm Spickermann
2006-02-24 10:31 ` Stephen Leake
2006-02-26 22:34 ` Wilhelm Spickermann
2006-02-23 8:21 ` john Doef [this message]
2006-02-23 9:22 ` Jean-Pierre Rosen
2006-02-23 13:11 ` Stephen Leake
2006-02-23 13:37 ` Justin Gombos
2006-02-23 13:06 ` Stephen Leake
2006-02-23 20:23 ` Simon Wright
2006-02-24 21:23 ` Randy Brukardt
2006-02-25 11:39 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2006-02-26 3:24 ` Steve Whalen
2006-02-26 9:51 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2006-02-27 2:26 ` Steve Whalen
2006-02-27 9:33 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2006-03-01 22:44 ` Robert A Duff
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox