From: matteo.bordin@gmail.com
Subject: Re: prohibit certain generic instantiations in Ada 2005
Date: 12 Feb 2006 04:41:02 -0800
Date: 2006-02-12T04:41:02-08:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1139748062.833652.170890@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4u3pbsvfen5r.9fs4r2tkp6m2.dlg@40tude.net>
I agree with you that the use of generics in my example is exagerated.
But I am working on an application that requires a generic-based
approach for components (while functional code can be "encapsulated" as
classes' methods). BTW, the architecture I am working on has nothing to
do with cars or transmission. As you said, the problem is more at the
design/analysis level but it would be nice to map it on the code. The
final aim is to produce a library that automatically checks at compile
time if it is used correctly.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-02-12 12:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-02-09 18:01 prohibit certain generic instantiations in Ada 2005 matteo.bordin
2006-02-09 20:02 ` Matthew Heaney
2006-02-10 14:18 ` matteo.bordin
2006-02-10 18:25 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2006-02-10 19:03 ` Georg Bauhaus
2006-02-11 10:45 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2006-02-11 8:04 ` matteo.bordin
2006-02-11 9:54 ` Martin Krischik
2006-02-11 10:20 ` matteo.bordin
2006-02-11 12:46 ` Martin Krischik
2006-02-11 10:45 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2006-02-11 22:20 ` Jeffrey R. Carter
2006-02-11 15:36 ` Stephen Leake
2006-02-12 8:55 ` matteo.bordin
2006-02-12 9:49 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2006-02-12 12:41 ` matteo.bordin [this message]
2006-02-13 19:14 ` Matthew Heaney
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox