From: "ldb" <louis@pittpatt.com>
Subject: Re: Allocated aligned arrays
Date: 18 Nov 2005 14:31:52 -0800
Date: 2005-11-18T14:31:52-08:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1132353112.226494.256380@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1132351560.528877.151360@g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>
However, if I do that, won't that essentially break every current
implementation of Matrix already in the code? (The code isn't small,
and it's a very commonly used datatype... ).
Ie, is that going to require me to overload +, -, etc to work with Real
and Floats, etc? And/or functions that pass in a float, currently, will
need to be overloaded to also work with real, and so on? That seems
like alot of work just to get a memory allocation that is 8 bytes
farther north or south. Is there any other way, or I am up a creek?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-11-18 22:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-11-18 21:35 Allocated aligned arrays ldb
2005-11-18 22:06 ` jimmaureenrogers
2005-11-18 22:31 ` ldb [this message]
2005-11-20 11:21 ` Martin Krischik
2005-11-18 22:51 ` Simon Wright
2005-11-18 23:03 ` ldb
2005-11-19 7:36 ` Simon Wright
2005-11-19 13:12 ` Jeff Creem
2005-11-23 0:17 ` Randy Brukardt
2005-11-23 14:28 ` ldb
2005-11-24 1:39 ` Frank J. Lhota
2005-11-27 20:49 ` Robert A Duff
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox