comp.lang.ada
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Britt Snodgrass" <britt.snodgrass@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Default rep specs for record types - documented??
Date: 4 Nov 2005 07:27:53 -0800
Date: 2005-11-04T07:27:53-08:00	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1131118073.282094.236790@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: uy844sci9.fsf@acm.org


Stephen Leake wrote:
> Stephen Leake <stephen_leake@acm.org> writes:
>

<snip>
>
> One solution is to have the compiler write the representation clause
> for me; in this case, if we make reasonable assumptions about
> 'record_type', there is only one reasonable rep clause. So I'd like to
> define:


Starting with version 4.2 I believe, the Apex Ada editor has a "Build
Rep Clauses" feature that will insert all applicable compiler generated
confirming representation clauses following a type declaration. I've
tried it with Apex NT 4.2.0c and it works nicely.

Here is an example:

    type Record_Type is
        record
            Field_0 : Integer_16;
            Field_1 : Integer_16;
            Field_2 : Integer_16;
        end record;

    for Record_Type use
        record
            Field_0 at 0 range 0 .. 15;
            Field_1 at 2 range 0 .. 15;
            Field_2 at 4 range 0 .. 15;
        end record;
    for Record_Type'Alignment use 4;
    for Record_Type'Size use 48;
    pragma Convention (Ada_Pass_By_Copy, Record_Type);

Everything after the record type declaration was generated by the
compiler and inserted by the editor,

-- Britt




  reply	other threads:[~2005-11-04 15:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 60+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-11-04  2:21 Default rep specs for record types - documented?? Anonymous Coward
2005-11-04  2:36 ` Steve
2005-11-04  4:11   ` Anonymous Coward
2005-11-04  5:30     ` Jeffrey R. Carter
2005-11-05  3:13       ` Steve
2005-11-05  4:45         ` Jeffrey R. Carter
2005-11-06 14:05           ` Steve
2005-11-06 16:08             ` Anonymous Coward
2005-11-07  7:25             ` Jeffrey R. Carter
2005-11-08 13:36               ` Steve
2005-11-14  1:12             ` Robert A Duff
2005-11-14  3:03               ` Anonymous Coward
2005-11-14 18:08                 ` Jeffrey R. Carter
2005-11-14 18:49                 ` Robert A Duff
2005-11-15  1:16                   ` ADA compilers can reject types arbitrarily? Anonymous Coward
2005-11-15  2:10                     ` tmoran
2005-11-15  3:12                     ` Robert A Duff
2005-11-15  6:44                     ` Simon Wright
2005-11-16  0:16                       ` Adaists Deny Acronym. (was: ADA compilers can reject types arbitrarily?) Björn Persson
2005-11-16  5:38                         ` Adaists Deny Acronym Simon Wright
2005-11-16  6:16                         ` Adaists Deny Acronym. (was: ADA compilers can reject types arbitrarily?) Samuel Tardieu
2005-11-15 12:43                     ` ADA compilers can reject types arbitrarily? Jeff Creem
2005-11-14 21:14                 ` Default rep specs for record types - documented?? Simon Wright
2005-11-04 13:26     ` Stephen Leake
2005-11-04 14:33       ` Marc A. Criley
2005-11-04 18:35         ` Georg Bauhaus
2005-11-04 20:07           ` Britt Snodgrass
2005-11-04 14:39       ` Stephen Leake
2005-11-04 15:27         ` Britt Snodgrass [this message]
2005-11-04 15:55           ` Lauri Ora
2005-11-04 21:42             ` Larry Kilgallen
2005-11-05  2:26             ` Anonymous Coward
2005-11-05  2:42               ` Frank J. Lhota
2005-11-05  3:27               ` Ed Falis
2005-11-05  3:55                 ` Anonymous Coward
2005-11-05  4:07                 ` Lauri Ora
2005-11-05 13:46                   ` Ed Falis
2005-11-05 10:14                 ` Stephen Leake
2005-11-04 16:52         ` Frank J. Lhota
2005-11-04 16:57           ` Frank J. Lhota
2005-11-04 23:27           ` tmoran
2005-11-05 10:25           ` Stephen Leake
2005-11-14  1:09             ` Robert A Duff
2005-11-05  3:33       ` Anonymous Coward
2005-11-05 10:34         ` Stephen Leake
2005-11-05 16:35           ` ADA/C interfaces: type representations uncontrollable in C Anonymous Coward
2005-11-05 16:49             ` Ed Falis
2005-11-05 18:24             ` tmoran
2005-11-09  2:12           ` 'Size can mean value size OR object size, depending Anonymous Coward
2005-11-09  3:27             ` Jeffrey R. Carter
2005-11-09  4:04               ` Anonymous Coward
2005-11-05 14:27         ` Default rep specs for record types - documented?? Michael Bode
2005-11-05 16:17           ` pragma convention Anonymous Coward
2005-11-06  1:07             ` Jeffrey R. Carter
2005-11-06 22:22               ` Anonymous Coward
2005-11-07  7:34                 ` Jeffrey R. Carter
2005-11-05 14:39         ` Default rep specs for record types - documented?? Martin Krischik
2005-11-04  9:40   ` Martin Dowie
2005-11-04 14:36   ` Marc A. Criley
2005-11-04 17:45 ` Martin Krischik
replies disabled

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox