From: "Thorsten" <thorsten.behrens@dorunth.de>
Subject: Re: Interrupt handler seems not to be called in GNAT 3.15p
Date: 16 Jun 2005 00:38:56 -0700
Date: 2005-06-16T00:38:56-07:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1118907535.965600.202910@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: mailman.49.1118904653.17633.comp.lang.ada@ada-france.org
Hi David!
> Did you use the pragma Unreserved_all_Interrupts?
Yes, it is just in the first line of the specification of
SIGNAL_HANDLER.
> See the discussion of that Pragma un the GNAT Reference Manual
There it says that, after using pragma UNRESERVE_ALL_INTERRUPTS, my
program shall be able to handle this signal. I also took a look at
a-intnam.ads, where all interrupts, that may be handled by an
application, are defined with symbolic names. There is no hint
whatsoever why the application should not be able to handle SIGSEGV.
Regards,
Thorsten
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-06-16 7:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-06-15 15:39 Interrupt handler seems not to be called in GNAT 3.15p Thorsten
2005-06-16 6:52 ` David C. Hoos, Sr.
2005-06-16 7:38 ` Thorsten [this message]
2005-06-16 8:03 ` Egil H. H�vik
2005-06-16 9:36 ` Thorsten
2005-06-17 8:33 ` Thorsten
2005-06-17 8:47 ` Duncan Sands
2005-06-22 10:04 ` Thorsten
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox