From: "Rod Chapman" <rod.chapman@praxis-his.com>
Subject: Re: SPARK and Interfaces.C
Date: 14 May 2005 08:41:05 -0700
Date: 2005-05-14T08:41:05-07:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1116085265.915121.296690@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d64uju$4eq$1@nwrdmz02.dmz.ncs.ea.ibs-infra.bt.com>
Yes...but the whole point of shadows in SPARK is that you _don't_
want the Examiner to read in the compiler's standard specifications
of these packages, since they aren't legal SPARK!
- Rod
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-05-14 15:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-05-13 17:34 SPARK and Interfaces.C ich_bin_elvis
2005-05-13 19:40 ` JP Thornley
2005-05-14 12:15 ` Rod Chapman
2005-05-14 13:31 ` Martin Dowie
2005-05-14 15:41 ` Rod Chapman [this message]
2005-05-17 10:55 ` ich_bin_elvis
2005-05-17 14:40 ` Rod Chapman
2005-05-19 8:12 ` ich_bin_elvis
2005-05-19 8:46 ` ich_bin_elvis
2005-05-19 9:01 ` Rod Chapman
2005-05-19 10:25 ` ich_bin_elvis
2005-05-21 22:52 ` JP Thornley
2005-05-23 9:48 ` ich_bin_elvis
2005-05-23 13:30 ` JP Thornley
2005-05-23 15:10 ` JP Thornley
2005-05-24 8:57 ` ich_bin_elvis
2005-05-24 10:36 ` JP Thornley
2005-05-24 20:34 ` ich_bin_elvis
2005-05-25 7:54 ` JP Thornley
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox