From: "Mattias Lindblad" <ml_news@matli.net>
Subject: Re: Annex I?
Date: 1 Apr 2005 00:57:36 -0800
Date: 2005-04-01T00:57:36-08:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1112345856.897270.49410@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: wccoeczzeh6.fsf@shell01.TheWorld.com
Thanks for a fast and authoritative answer!
> What's IEEE 1003.5?
"POSIX Ada Language Interfaces- Part 1: Binding for System
Application Program Interface (API)", i.e. the bindings between
Ada and POSIX.
> There might have been a preliminary version with an Annex I [...]
> But if so, nobody should be referring to such a preliminary,
> unapproved version.
I agree. The IEEE standard refers to a version of the Ada standard
issued 15 February 1995. However, the first edition of the IEEE
standard was issued 1996, so one could guess that they started with
a preliminary version of the Ada standard while writing the standard
and didn't notice the change in annex numbering in the final version.
> The ISO rules also forbid paragraph numbers.
Isn't it possible to get some kind of exemption from those rules? My C
and C++ standards (from 1999) both have paragraph numbering, and I
believe they are bought from ISO. Or maybe those standards are simply
not standard compliant. (In addition to the paragraph numbering,
the C standard actually has an "Annex I".)
//Mattias
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-04-01 8:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-03-31 9:31 Annex I? Mattias Lindblad
2005-03-31 21:34 ` Robert A Duff
2005-04-01 8:57 ` Mattias Lindblad [this message]
2005-04-01 15:29 ` Robert A Duff
2005-04-01 23:32 ` Randy Brukardt
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox