Re: seperate compilation for protected objects

["Andrew" <andrew@carroll-tech.net>]

Thanks Jean-Pierre.  The problem was that I spelled separate wrong.
Once I corrected it everything went well.

Jean-Pierre Rosen wrote:
> Andrew a écrit :
> > Hello,
> >
> > I am trying to do seperate compilation with a protected object.
> >
> > I have something similar to the following:
> >
> > === file tasks.ads ===
> > package Tasks is
> >
> >     protected type Boob is
> >         . . .
> >     end Boob;
> > end Tasks;
> >
> > === file tasks.adb ===
> > package body Tasks is
> >     <blah>
> >     protected body Boob is seperate;
> > end Tasks;
> >
> > I am using Gnat3.15p on FreeBSD Unix.
> > I get similar compilation messages to the below:
> > tasks.adb:<#>:<#>: all components must be declared in spec
> > ...
> >
> A wild guess, since you didn't show the body:
> Didn't you declare components in the body? i.e.
>
> protected body Boob is
>      X : integer; -- Not allowed
>      ....
> end Boob;
>
> Remember that a protected object is actually more like a record than
a
> package; it has no variables, only components (like record
components),
> and they are not allowed in the body.
>
> Presumably, this has nothing to do with separate compilation...
>
> --
> ---------------------------------------------------------
>             J-P. Rosen (rosen@adalog.fr)
> Visit Adalog's web site at http://www.adalog.fr