From: george.priv@gmail.com
Subject: Re: Ada syntax patents
Date: 24 Feb 2005 08:04:25 -0800
Date: 2005-02-24T08:04:25-08:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1109258397.763243.44860@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <421b581b$0$13221$9b4e6d93@newsread4.arcor-online.net>
Georg Bauhaus wrote:
> Reading
> "http://appft1.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?"
> &
"Sect1=PTO1&Sect2=HITOFF&d=PG01&p=1&u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsrchnum.html"
> & "&r=1&f=G&l=50&s1=%2220040230959%22.PGNR."
> & "&OS=DN/20040230959&RS=DN/20040230959", i.e.
>
>
http://appft1.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO1&Sect2=HITOFF&d=PG01&p=1&u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsrchnum.html&r=1&f=G&l=50&s1=%2220040230959%22.PGNR.&OS=DN/20040230959&RS=DN/20040230959
>
> about compiling the BASIC IsNot operator, Patent Application
20040230959.
>
> What's this? What are they trying to protect? Is something
> like this on the way for Ada?
> Interesting, everyone with an interest in a software exchange
> with a US resident/whatever will have to consider whether they
> can use comparison operators without being US-charged, patent
> (im)pending.
>
> -- Georg
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-02-24 16:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-02-22 16:04 Ada syntax patents Georg Bauhaus
2005-02-23 7:59 ` Martin Krischik
2005-02-23 8:56 ` rien
2005-02-23 9:42 ` Martin Krischik
2005-02-23 10:54 ` Georg Bauhaus
2005-02-23 11:00 ` Vinzent 'Gadget' Hoefler
2005-02-23 12:44 ` Martin Krischik
2005-02-23 14:02 ` Vinzent 'Gadget' Hoefler
2005-02-23 19:14 ` Preben Randhol
2005-02-23 10:24 ` Jean-Pierre Rosen
2005-02-23 14:54 ` rien
2005-02-24 19:31 ` Charles Lindsey
2005-02-24 16:04 ` george.priv [this message]
2005-02-24 19:16 ` Larry Kilgallen
2005-02-24 19:52 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2005-02-24 20:50 ` tmoran
2005-02-24 22:19 ` Georg Bauhaus
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox