From: falis@ma.aonix.com
Subject: Re: GUI in Ada
Date: 1998/09/18
Date: 1998-09-18T00:00:00+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1103_906130799@DZOG-CHEN> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 6ttqcp$ovu$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com
I've been working recently with Ainslie Software's AdaJNI
(www.ainslie-software.com), that provides bindings to JDK 1.1.6
and Swing 1.0.2, as well as a binding generator for arbitrary
Java classes.
AdaJNI works with GNAT and ObjectAda (and probably without
too much trouble with other compilers).
The idea is that the application runs as native Ada code and
fires up a JVM for the UI and for any other Java parts one might
wish to use.
So far, I've been able to set up connections to Marimba's Bongo
GUI builder (www.marimba.com), which uses the old JDK 1.0
event handling model (requires interpreting the events in your
Ada event handler by mapping widget names to enumeration
values, done by a simple generic I've written). Bongo is pretty
rich as a GUI builder, and is very easy to use, but it's product
future is uncertain. Note that despite the 1.0 event handling,
you can still use JDK 1.1.x or 1.2 beta.
This week, I set up a similar harness for IBM's VisualAge for
Java 2.0. Still working out some generalizations in the harness.
VA is a truly impressive IDE
(http://www.software.ibm.com/ad/vajava/), for which you can
download a free trial. It allows you to visually build and
compose arbitrary Java beans (including non-visual ones
incorporating application logic). This allows UI specific
manipulations that you may not want to have your Ada code
deal with to stay encapsulated in the GUI part. It also supports
Swing.
The harness I put together should allow arbitrary Java beans,
not just those from VA, to be interfaced via AdaJNI. I've been
using it effectively with JDK 1.2 beta 4.
The advantage fo the bean approach is that the interface to the
GUI or other java code is much better localized than for using
Bongo, as the JDK 1.1+ event model is used.
Although I haven't had the opportunity to test any of this with
UNIX compilers or GNAT, there's no theoretical reason that the
applications shouldn't be completely portable, JVM
implementation differences factored.
Just another approach to the problem.
- Ed Falis
Aonix
prev parent reply other threads:[~1998-09-18 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1998-09-15 0:00 GUI in Ada Christopher Raman
1998-09-15 0:00 ` Paul Whittington
1998-09-15 0:00 ` Markus Kuhn
1998-09-18 0:00 ` Gerhard H�ring
1998-09-18 0:00 ` dennison
1998-09-18 0:00 ` Corey Minyard
1998-09-18 0:00 ` falis [this message]
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox