From: "Dmitry A. Kazakov" <mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de>
Subject: Re: With Exceptions Disabled On Windows, How Can I Determine Where A Software Interrupt Occurs
Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2009 21:04:36 +0200
Date: 2009-10-20T21:04:32+02:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <10hvfezl7sqga$.8j87mxmxk66.dlg@40tude.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 4ade04dc$0$949$ba4acef3@news.orange.fr
On Tue, 20 Oct 2009 20:43:56 +0200, Pascal Obry wrote:
> Le 20/10/2009 20:37, Dmitry A. Kazakov a �crit :
>> Though the subject's text could be read as if the OP meant the case when
>> the corresponding check were suppressed. I.e.,.how do we detect something
>> that does not occur... (:-))
>
> I hadn't read that this way. But if the checks are suppressed then we
> will get a signal for divide by 0 and we should get a proper backtrace
> in this case with GNAT.
That depends on the hardware. But if zero divide indeed generates a
hardware interrupt, then, it is reasonable to suggest that the pragma
Suppress will have no effect on Constraint_Error propagation.
In which sense, the *software* (so the OP writes) exceptions were
"disabled"? Did he mean so-called Windows "Structured Exceptions"?
--
Regards,
Dmitry A. Kazakov
http://www.dmitry-kazakov.de
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-10-20 19:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <7091f995-dd7e-4442-8ca5-158b83e50bec@x5g2000prf.googlegroups.com>
2009-10-20 18:23 ` With Exceptions Disabled On Windows, How Can I Determine Where A Software Interrupt Occurs Pascal Obry
2009-10-20 18:37 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2009-10-20 18:43 ` Pascal Obry
2009-10-20 19:04 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov [this message]
2009-10-21 10:53 ` Georg Bauhaus
2009-10-20 20:50 ` sjw
[not found] <b0d7911b-cb10-4fb2-a977-da865b8b2001@u16g2000pru.googlegroups.com>
2009-10-20 19:31 ` Keith Thompson
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox