From: "Dmitry A. Kazakov" <mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de>
Subject: Re: Address of an object
Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2006 16:53:58 +0200
Date: 2006-09-18T16:53:58+02:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <10dlz7hv2h4fe$.1d34epi7ec2qg.dlg@40tude.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: eem8em$eet$1@sunnews.cern.ch
On Mon, 18 Sep 2006 15:54:30 +0200, Maciej Sobczak wrote:
> Dmitry A. Kazakov wrote:
>
>> I wanted to add something to a type without
>> quarreling with Ada, which mistakenly [OK, that was a political decision]
>> does not support MI.
>
> You might consider doing it in C++ instead.
Actually, I did. It was long ago. OK, there were other problems with that
in C++. But for all, the project is in Ada.
> Because - you know - *fighting with the language* can only increase the
> probability of introducing bugs and in the end increase the total cost
> of software production, not mentioning its maintenance.
That's true. But we should consider all causes where we are forced to fight
with the language.
And the problem with C++ is that it is almost impossible to cut a clean
design of anything by an inch more complex than hello-world...
--
Regards,
Dmitry A. Kazakov
http://www.dmitry-kazakov.de
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-09-18 14:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-09-15 20:24 Address of an object Dmitry A. Kazakov
2006-09-15 23:31 ` Adam Beneschan
2006-09-16 8:13 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2006-09-18 10:29 ` Stephen Leake
2006-09-18 12:09 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2006-09-18 13:54 ` Maciej Sobczak
2006-09-18 14:53 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov [this message]
2006-09-19 9:15 ` Stephen Leake
2006-09-19 13:29 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2006-09-16 13:21 ` Stephen Leake
2006-09-16 17:06 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2006-09-20 0:43 ` Randy Brukardt
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox