From: georg bauhaus <rmhost.bauhaus@maps.arcor.de>
Subject: Re: is having a complex type as built-in the languages vs. being in standard package makes performance difference?
Date: 16 May 2012 21:33:37 GMT
Date: 2012-05-16T23:33:37+02:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1099588589358896339.853580rmhost.bauhaus-maps.arcor.de@news.arcor.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: cd22d6b6-8cae-4713-ab92-9779f0b2eaf9@t2g2000pbg.googlegroups.com
Jerry <lanceboyle@qwest.net> wrote:
>
>> http://shootout.alioth.debian.org/u64/program.php?test=mandelbrot&lan...http://shootout.alioth.debian.org/u64/program.php?test=mandelbrot&lan...http://shootout.alioth.debian.org/u64/program.php?test=mandelbrot&lan...
>
> The third of these has no table of results.
> Jerry
They do not always measure all programs ever submitted, in this case you
might need to run the compiler yourself ;-)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-05-16 21:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-05-16 18:25 is having a complex type as built-in the languages vs. being in standard package makes performance difference? Nasser M. Abbasi
2012-05-16 19:23 ` Georg Bauhaus
2012-05-16 21:08 ` Jerry
2012-05-16 21:33 ` georg bauhaus [this message]
2012-05-17 1:48 ` Isaac Gouy
2012-05-16 19:26 ` gautier_niouzes
2012-05-17 0:19 ` Randy Brukardt
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox