From: Hyman Rosen <hyrosen@mail.com>
Subject: Re: Binding to feof
Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2004 13:16:57 -0400
Date: 2004-08-30T13:16:57-04:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1093886217.765346@master.nyc.kbcfp.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6cAYc.2378$w%6.414@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net>
Jeffrey Carter wrote:
> That would explain it. That seems to make the function useless, since
> the other operations in my binding raise an exception if an operation
> fails by reaching the end of file.
You cannot have anticipatory feof from the keyboard without actually
trying to read data and perhaps blocking, and in C, keyboard and file
I/O use the same mechanism. So instead, feof was designed to be after
the fact, so that when a read fails, you can check whether it was due
to EOF or some other reason.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-08-30 17:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-08-27 18:14 Binding to feof Jeffrey Carter
2004-08-27 21:07 ` Jerry van Dijk
2004-08-28 1:48 ` Jeffrey Carter
2004-08-28 2:25 ` Steve
2004-08-28 18:51 ` Jeffrey Carter
2004-08-28 10:26 ` Eric Jacoboni
2004-08-29 0:15 ` Keith Thompson
2004-08-30 6:56 ` Jeffrey Carter
2004-08-30 17:16 ` Hyman Rosen [this message]
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox