From: slos <new.stephane.los@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: License for "Ada for Automation"
Date: Sun, 24 Jan 2016 13:32:26 -0800 (PST)
Date: 2016-01-24T13:32:26-08:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <107bfd99-fd9c-4063-8977-7b5a2570f2c3@googlegroups.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <adfebcae-1c87-4aa0-9bd8-00c28e3c67b4@googlegroups.com>
Le dimanche 24 janvier 2016 05:08:29 UTC+1, David Botton a écrit :
> I would think the additional language is no longer needed as the FSF runtime exception should cover the same thing as that language did in GPLv2. In Gnoga I just copied what I saw in the available Gnat files at the time that had both exception and GMGPL language.
>
Hi David,
Thanks for the confirmation.
Since I am in the process of changing all the headers it's better to know if I'm wrong or not.
So I will put what is in the GtkAda files now.
Best Regards,
Stéphane
http://slo-ist.fr/ada4autom
prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-01-24 21:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-01-22 23:39 License for "Ada for Automation" slos
2016-01-24 4:08 ` David Botton
2016-01-24 21:32 ` slos [this message]
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox