From: "Randy Brukardt" <randy@rrsoftware.com>
Subject: Re: Xlib Binding or Re-implementation?
Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2004 14:36:52 -0600
Date: 2004-03-18T14:36:52-06:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <105k23mfioc2085@corp.supernews.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: c3bsg5$4tc$1@news.BelWue.DE
"Peter Hermann" <ica2ph@sinus.csv.ica.uni-stuttgart.de> wrote in message
news:c3bsg5$4tc$1@news.BelWue.DE...
> Preben Randhol <randhol+valid_for_reply_from_news@pvv.org> wrote:
> > Now this said. I would rather have Gwindow or Claw ported to work on
> > Linux and Mac OS, than a new library. I don't want to put you off what
>
> if Randy agrees...
I have no objection to a Mac Claw. Its not clear to me if the interface of
Claw is too Windows-specific. We had considered a system-independent layer
that would be built on top of classic (Windows) Claw, but to date we haven't
bothered because the need seems to be met by GTKAda. But if anyone wants to
persue it, I'd be happy to hear from them.
Randy.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-03-18 20:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-03-16 21:20 Xlib Binding or Re-implementation? Ben Atkin
2004-03-17 9:46 ` Preben Randhol
2004-03-17 23:11 ` Ben Atkin
2004-03-18 0:19 ` Ludovic Brenta
2004-03-20 22:48 ` Ben Atkin
2004-03-21 8:34 ` Preben Randhol
2004-03-18 10:00 ` Preben Randhol
2004-03-18 10:09 ` Peter Hermann
2004-03-18 20:36 ` Randy Brukardt [this message]
2004-03-31 7:36 ` David Starner
2004-03-17 10:34 ` Ludovic Brenta
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox