From: Hyman Rosen <hyrosen@mail.com>
Subject: Re: sorting large numbers of large records
Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2003 16:52:11 -0400
Date: 2003-07-28T16:52:11-04:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1059425531.850814@master.nyc.kbcfp.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bg41uo$9th@library2.airnews.net>
John R. Strohm wrote:
> Incidentally, depending on your system, it might be to your advantage to
> maintain TWO datafiles: one big one that is sorted, and one little one that
> isn't, but contains things that have been modified recently.
If he reaches this point, the OP might just want to
move to a real database, where problems like this
havel already been dealt with.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-07-28 20:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-07-28 15:29 sorting large numbers of large records Brien L. Christesen
2003-07-28 15:35 ` Vinzent Hoefler
2003-07-31 15:22 ` Brien L. Christesen
2003-07-28 16:25 ` Hyman Rosen
2003-07-28 20:30 ` John R. Strohm
2003-07-28 20:52 ` Hyman Rosen [this message]
2003-07-28 23:47 ` Matthew Heaney
2003-07-28 23:33 ` Matthew Heaney
2003-07-28 23:43 ` Matthew Heaney
2003-07-29 0:42 ` John Cupak
2003-07-29 3:38 ` Matthew Heaney
2003-07-29 8:32 ` Preben Randhol
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-07-29 13:10 Brien L. Christesen
2003-07-29 14:30 ` Larry Kilgallen
2003-07-30 0:32 ` Keith Thompson
2003-07-30 1:53 ` Hyman Rosen
2003-07-30 14:55 ` Matthew Heaney
2003-07-30 16:41 ` Chad R. Meiners
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox