Re: Status of SDLAda

[Luke A. Guest <laguest@archeia.com>]

Michael B. <michaelb@example.com> wrote:
> On 09/13/16 00:01, Luke A. Guest wrote:

>> interface, thin where need be thick when required, stick to the Ada style
> 
> Fine :-)

Cool.

> I have written an Ada package (two files) for RWOps. What should I do 
> with them? Do you prefer a fork/pull-request on Github, an email or 
> something else?

Git format-patch, can you declare in the commit that you are assigning it
to me? You can email it through git or GitHub.

This will make binding sdl image lib easier as well. 

I would like to have an Ada stream interface but I don't think that will be
possible.

>> and agrees to copyright assignment which can be done in a hit pull /patch.
> 
> I've never thought about this legal stuff, but I'm ok with that. Just 
> tell me what I need to do.

Yeah I've been thinking more about this recently as I want to keep this
binding matching the libsdl license and if they change it, it'll be s pain.
I doubt they will as libsdl2 used to be pure GPL.

You see, AdaCore generated a thin binding and then slapped a GPL license,
no exception, which was stupid and really insulting.

I want to make sure this stays as free as possible and be the best binding
there is.

Luke