Re: Ada 2005?

[Martin Krischik <martin@krischik.com>]

Larry Kilgallen wrote:

> In article <22079486.hMfpcNLlTu@linux1.krischik.com>, Martin Krischik
> <martin@krischik.com> writes:
>> Larry Kilgallen wrote:
>> 
>>> In article <1750748.eDONUVZfBc@linux1.krischik.com>, Martin Krischik
>>> <martin@krischik.com> writes:
>>>> jimmaureenrogers@worldnet.att.net wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> There are actually some other small differences between "struct" and
>>>>> "class" in C++.
>>>>> In a "struct" all members are public by default, while in a "class"
>>>>> all members are private by default.
>>>> 
>>>> But that is exactly what I said.
>>>> 
>>>> For those who can't read regular expression
>>>> 
>>>> is you replace "class X {"  with "struct X { private :" then nothing
>>>> changes.
>>> 
>>> I was under the impression the discussions here were to be in English
>>> or Ada, not in some other syntax from particular platforms.
>> 
>> You are right. Where is the problem?
> 
> Someone making a post that expects people to read "regular expression".

You are right and I did see my error and correted it by translating the
regex to plain english. There are not <sarkasm> marks around the sentence
"For those who can't read regular expression". It was meant as it stays
there and no offence was meant.

With Regards

Martin

-- 
mailto://krischik@users.sourceforge.net
http://www.ada.krischik.com