From: Hyman Rosen <hyrosen@mail.com>
Subject: Re: Ada Versus PL/I - The debate continues
Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2003 18:02:36 -0500
Date: 2003-03-17T18:02:36-05:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1047942157.179545@master.nyc.kbcfp.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3E764F5F.4A025D83@yahoo.com>
Peter Flass wrote:
> They were excluded because they were difficult to implement.
Sounds like a fantasy to me.
> Java with its "try/catch" has tried to re-introduce this.
Java and C++ exception handling, like Ada's, is purely static.
> Any other type of error handling is deficient.
Exception handling is the best way to handle errors.
If you need resume semantics, place an exception handler
closely around the statement you wish to resume, and loop.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-03-17 23:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <Movca.664$dE2.1469@newsfeeds.bigpond.com>
2003-03-16 4:02 ` Ada Versus PL/I - The debate continues Richard Riehle
2003-03-16 21:00 ` John W. Kennedy
2003-03-17 22:44 ` Peter Flass
2003-03-17 23:02 ` Hyman Rosen [this message]
2003-03-18 1:49 ` John W. Kennedy
2003-04-01 2:36 ` Robert I. Eachus
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox