From: Hyman Rosen <hyrosen@mail.com>
Subject: Re: Zeller's Algorithm
Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2002 18:34:37 -0400
Date: 2002-07-31T18:34:37-04:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1028154739.212226@master.nyc.kbcfp.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: wcck7nb1u7c.fsf@shell01.TheWorld.com
Robert A Duff wrote:
> to claim it's not a flaw seems wrong.
I didn't claim it's not a flaw, I just claimed that it wasn't
totally useless. In any case, every machine I ever worked on
has used round towards zero, but as you go on to say, when I
use %, I tend to make sure that the arguments are not negative.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-07-31 22:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-07-23 23:56 Zeller's Algorithm Paul A Storm
2002-07-24 7:59 ` Thomas Wolf
2002-07-24 21:30 ` Paul A Storm
2002-07-29 8:29 ` Thomas Wolf
2002-07-30 4:35 ` Robert Dewar
2002-07-30 8:20 ` Thomas Wolf
2002-07-30 17:17 ` Rick Maffei
2002-07-30 22:10 ` Paul A Storm
2002-07-31 10:51 ` Thomas Wolf
2002-07-31 14:33 ` Frank J. Lhota
2002-07-31 19:13 ` Robert A Duff
2002-07-31 19:26 ` Darren New
2002-07-31 20:01 ` Hyman Rosen
2002-07-31 20:15 ` Frank J. Lhota
2002-07-31 21:08 ` Robert A Duff
2002-07-31 22:34 ` Hyman Rosen [this message]
2002-07-31 22:57 ` Robert A Duff
2002-08-01 15:17 ` Hyman Rosen
2002-08-01 16:41 ` Frank J. Lhota
2002-07-31 21:15 ` Dan Nagle
2002-07-31 22:36 ` Hyman Rosen
2002-07-31 22:23 ` Matthew Woodcraft
2002-08-02 7:21 ` Thomas Wolf
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox