From: kt4@prism.gatech.EDU (Ken Thompson)
Subject: Re: tasking in language a bad idea
Date: 4 Jun 90 21:26:23 GMT [thread overview]
Message-ID: <10106@hydra.gatech.EDU> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 1930@cod.NOSC.MIL
In article <1930@cod.NOSC.MIL> sampson@cod.nosc.mil.UUCP (Charles H. Sampson) writes:
>In article <20104@grebyn.com> ted@grebyn.com (Ted Holden) writes:
>>
>>Check out the 750 "problems" listed on the AdaWoe bulletin board...
>>
> I case anyone is being misled by the repeated references to Ada's
>"750 problems", these are the unfiltered "problems" submitted during
>the 9X comment period. There is much duplication and overlapping among
>them. For example, on
>Charlie Sampson, CSC
I am not a fanatic on either side of the Ada language issue. I like most
all of what they tried to do with it. I don't really like how some turned
out. I would say that 750 unfiltered problems/wish lists/etc is a relatively
small number. I wonder how many of these types of things
the ANSI C committee had to wade through. My impression was a whole lot.
Ken
--
Ken Thompson GTRI, Ga. Tech, Atlanta Ga. 30332 Internet:!kt4@prism.gatech.edu
uucp:...!{allegra,amd,hplabs,ut-ngp}!gatech!prism!kt4
"Rowe's Rule: The odds are five to six that the light at the end of the
tunnel is the headlight of an oncoming train." -- Paul Dickson
next prev parent reply other threads:[~1990-06-04 21:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1990-06-04 2:42 tasking in language a bad idea Ted Holden
1990-06-04 8:30 ` diamond@tkovoa
1990-06-04 16:31 ` Executible Program size (was Re: tasking in language a bad idea) Andy DeFaria
1990-06-04 18:25 ` tasking in language a bad idea Charles H. Sampson
1990-06-04 21:26 ` Ken Thompson [this message]
1990-06-04 19:22 ` Executible Program size (was Re: tasking in language a bad idea) Paul A. Varner
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox