comp.lang.ada
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: christoph.grein@eurocopter.com
Subject: Re: requeue with abort and timed call
Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2008 05:18:58 -0800 (PST)
Date: 2008-12-30T05:18:58-08:00	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <0f9bf864-927b-442c-a435-1713c40cfd30@r15g2000prh.googlegroups.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: kepcjg.od.ln@hunter.axlog.fr

On 30 Dez., 10:25, Jean-Pierre Rosen <ro...@adalog.fr> wrote:
> No. A timed entry call means: "if the server does not arrive within XX
> seconds, I give up". Requeue (with abort) allows the server to get the
> request, inspect the parameters, and decide that this request cannot be
> serviced now and put it back on wait. This is transparent as seen from
> the client's side.

So what you say here is that the delay is still active in the time
line I gave in a previous post and Requeued_Call must be aborted? If
so, GNAT is definitively in error.

> Time line is like following;
>  0.0 The call of Original_Call
> *1.0 The expiration time of original call, so no abort, because in
> rendezvous
>  3.0 Complete Original_Call
> *3.0 Queued on Requeued_Call, which is never serviced, but which is
> also not abortable (no delay active).

> So I do not see a problem with the behavious as shown in the OP's
> example.

> *3.0 Queued on Requeued_Call - hm, you think the delay is still
> active? We need a language lawyer to enlighten us.

I guess this should be put to Ada-Comment for a definitive answer by
Ada mainainers (Randy, Tuck, etc.).



  reply	other threads:[~2008-12-30 13:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-12-28 13:24 requeue with abort and timed call ishikawa
2008-12-28 14:30 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2008-12-28 15:53   ` christoph.grein
2008-12-28 16:09     ` christoph.grein
2008-12-28 17:46       ` ishikawa
2008-12-29 10:23         ` christoph.grein
2008-12-29 10:55           ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2008-12-29 11:17             ` christoph.grein
2008-12-29 12:27               ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2008-12-28 17:16     ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2008-12-28 21:42       ` Robert A Duff
2008-12-29 10:42       ` Jean-Pierre Rosen
2008-12-29 21:05         ` sjw
2008-12-30  9:25           ` Jean-Pierre Rosen
2008-12-30 13:18             ` christoph.grein [this message]
2008-12-30 15:39               ` Jean-Pierre Rosen
2008-12-30 17:01                 ` christoph.grein
2008-12-30 17:16                   ` ishikawa
2008-12-30 15:54               ` ishikawa
2008-12-30 21:33             ` sjw
2008-12-30 22:52               ` Robert A Duff
2008-12-31  9:21               ` Jean-Pierre Rosen
2008-12-31 15:39                 ` christoph.grein
2008-12-31 16:14                   ` Jean-Pierre Rosen
2009-01-03 16:49                     ` ishikawa
2009-01-03 21:09                       ` Jeffrey R. Carter
2009-01-04 15:40                         ` christoph.grein
2009-01-04 17:09                           ` Jeffrey R. Carter
2009-01-04 18:03                         ` ishikawa
2009-01-04 18:56                           ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2009-01-04 23:17                             ` belteshazzar
2009-01-05  9:12                               ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2009-01-05  2:48                             ` Jeffrey R. Carter
2009-01-05  9:30                               ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2009-01-05 20:28                                 ` Jeffrey R. Carter
2009-01-05 20:47                                   ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2009-01-06  2:35                                     ` Jeffrey R. Carter
2009-01-05 10:17                           ` Jean-Pierre Rosen
2008-12-28 15:53 ` sjw
replies disabled

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox