From: alb348@gmail.com
Subject: Re: Qt or Gtk? (from an Ada perspective)
Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2012 02:49:33 -0700 (PDT)
Date: 2012-09-18T02:49:33-07:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <0c19f250-7508-4eff-acc9-3e99ff7ff06a@googlegroups.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <44ed5dd4-451e-43eb-be80-5c554e5c86d6@googlegroups.com>
> Zenity looks interesting indeed. Only, it does not seem to support text
> edit boxes (unless I am mistaken), which I really need.
I can now confirm it, after checking more thoroughly: no text edit boxes in Zenity. Too bad, because otherwise it would have been perfect for my needs.
I am afraid that for a decent text edit box, the compelled choice will be either Qt or Gtk, after all.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-09-18 9:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-09-17 11:34 Qt or Gtk? (from an Ada perspective) alb348
2012-09-17 12:55 ` Patrick
2012-09-17 15:41 ` alb348
2012-09-17 15:50 ` Ludovic Brenta
2012-09-17 15:54 ` alb348
2012-09-18 6:38 ` Vadim Godunko
2012-09-17 16:22 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2012-09-18 5:41 ` QtAda in Debian (was: Re: Qt or Gtk? (from an Ada perspective)) Dirk Heinrichs
2012-09-18 7:16 ` Ludovic Brenta
2012-09-18 14:35 ` Dirk Heinrichs
2012-09-17 15:58 ` Qt or Gtk? (from an Ada perspective) Dmitry A. Kazakov
2012-09-17 16:21 ` J-P. Rosen
2012-09-17 20:49 ` Brian Drummond
2012-09-18 1:52 ` Stephen Leake
2012-09-18 6:28 ` Thomas Løcke
2012-09-18 8:47 ` Brian Drummond
2012-09-18 9:43 ` alb348
2012-09-18 9:49 ` alb348 [this message]
2012-09-18 10:14 ` Brian Drummond
2012-09-18 10:29 ` Brian Drummond
2012-09-18 11:00 ` alb348
2012-09-24 5:32 ` J-P. Rosen
2012-09-24 20:07 ` Patrick
2012-09-24 20:30 ` Pascal Obry
2012-09-24 20:42 ` J-P. Rosen
2012-09-24 21:11 ` Simon Wright
2012-09-24 22:56 ` Patrick
2012-09-19 11:14 ` tonyg
2012-09-19 16:13 ` Rego, P.
2012-09-20 15:53 ` leonid.dulman
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox