Re: Another problem with "interface"

["Egil Høvik" <egilhovik@hotmail.com>]

On Feb 16, 12:27 pm, Robert_Matthews <igno...@ramatthews.free-
online.co.uk> wrote:
> Georg Bauhaus wrote:
> > Uhm, I think that, still, you can call functions
> > that will assign the (already existing) return
> > objcect. Which was, IIUC, the point of coining the
> > word "constructor function".
>
> >   X: constant New_A_T := Set_A;
>
> >http://www.adacore.com/2007/05/28/gem-3/
>
> Indeed, that is my intent.
> Note that if I use an ordinary record type, e.g.
>
>  type New_A_Type is new A_Type with ...
>
> then GNAT compiles things OK; it is when
> I use a protected type it complains.
>
> Robert

Actually, it is when the protected type inherits an interface it
complains.
For me, at least, (using Gnat Pro 6.1.2) removing the inheritance
compiles OK...