From: marciant@earthlink.net
Subject: GNAT "alignment value must be positive"
Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2015 13:16:03 -0700 (PDT)
Date: 2015-04-06T13:16:03-07:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <0817bf94-0550-40c4-ba5f-f2ecd6383dbb@googlegroups.com> (raw)
So, what is the reason that GNAT does not accept "s'alignment use 0;" on intel x86 systems? I recently read that Alignment_Check is now "no" by default for such systems - but making that configuration setting on GNAT GPL 2014 does not seem to make any difference on the code in question. Is there a different setting to allow items not necessarily aligned to byte boundaries other than setting GNAT to ignore the representation clause?
next reply other threads:[~2015-04-06 20:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-04-06 20:16 marciant [this message]
2015-04-06 20:48 ` GNAT "alignment value must be positive" Shark8
2015-04-07 15:28 ` marciant
2015-04-07 15:27 ` marciant
2015-04-07 18:46 ` Jeffrey Carter
2015-04-07 19:45 ` marciant
2015-04-08 20:18 ` Randy Brukardt
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2015-04-08 20:35 Randy Brukardt
2015-04-09 13:28 ` marciant
2015-04-10 0:21 ` Randy Brukardt
2015-04-10 15:45 ` marciant
2015-04-10 21:18 ` Randy Brukardt
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox