Re: Listing currently maintained libraries for Ada

[Marco <prenom_nomus@yahoo.com>]

On Thursday, June 14, 2012 10:37:59 PM UTC-7, Jeffrey Carter wrote:
> On 06/14/2012 08:51 PM, i3text@gmail.com wrote:
> > When searching for Ada libraries, it is discouraging to find mostly dead
> > links or links to dead projects. So I decided to make a list of all the
> > libraries I could find that seem to be still active projects. To be listed, a
> > library must have seen some maintenance activity within the last year. I
> > generally ingored things that are already part of the GNAT distribution.
> >
> > At first, I wanted to list just libraries of production quality, but I
> > figured I couldn't reliably evaluate that. So, a lot of the things here are
> > alpha quality. Of course, there are libraries that haven't seen any work for
> > several years but still get downloaded a lot. But I wanted a listing of
> > libraries where I could reasonably expect help and bug-fixes.
> >
> > Do you know any I've missed?
> 
> Your criteria are somewhat strange. A mature library will be useful but see no 
> "maintenance activity" because there is no longer anything to change. 

I agree that all usable libraries should be listed. 
Can this list be transferred to wikipedia or other well maintained website?
Maybe Library Authors can just add a note on the their website once a year or so to show that is a still a viable library.

I also appreciate the OPs effort.