From: Adam Beneschan <adam@irvine.com>
Subject: Re: Generic Zero Length Array
Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2008 08:41:01 -0800 (PST)
Date: 2008-02-25T08:41:01-08:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <03b2715a-b4ab-4919-aa1d-97bfbf0f1c07@64g2000hsw.googlegroups.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: wccablrpx2p.fsf@shell01.TheWorld.com
On Feb 23, 6:27 am, Robert A Duff <bobd...@shell01.TheWorld.com>
wrote:
>
> >...I don't think we need "null record" (i.e. in
> > aggregates) any more either, although certainly nobody is going to
> > suggest removing it.
>
> Why don't we need that?
Because if Rec_Type is a record with no components, Rec_Type'(others
=> <>) will work (and has the same effect as (null record)).
Or is there some more complex cases where the "null record" syntax is
still needed in aggregates?
-- Adam
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-02-25 16:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-02-22 13:31 Generic Zero Length Array shaunpatterson
2008-02-22 13:53 ` Egil Høvik
2008-02-22 13:55 ` shaunpatterson
2008-02-22 14:11 ` Georg Bauhaus
2008-02-22 19:25 ` Randy Brukardt
2008-02-22 23:01 ` Adam Beneschan
2008-02-23 9:30 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2008-02-23 14:27 ` Robert A Duff
2008-02-23 16:16 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2008-02-25 16:41 ` Adam Beneschan [this message]
2008-02-25 19:14 ` Robert A Duff
2008-02-22 19:25 ` Randy Brukardt
2008-02-22 19:25 ` Randy Brukardt
2008-02-22 14:23 ` Stefan Lucks
2008-02-22 16:52 ` Adam Beneschan
2008-02-22 14:26 ` Robert A Duff
2008-02-22 15:22 ` Stefan Bellon
2008-02-22 23:03 ` Adam Beneschan
2008-02-23 10:19 ` Stefan Bellon
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox