comp.lang.ada
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Martin <martin.dowie@btopenworld.com>
Subject: Re: GNAT on WinXP: System.OS_Lib.Spawn raises Program_Error
Date: Tue, 5 May 2009 01:06:44 -0700 (PDT)
Date: 2009-05-05T01:06:44-07:00	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <02d45d5d-1543-4b65-90e0-b5b82eed048c@b1g2000vbc.googlegroups.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: XINLl.26172$941.14309@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net

On May 5, 3:43 am, a...@anon.org (anon) wrote:
> Actually, Adacore stated in March 2007, "Ada 2005, ISO/IEC 8652, was
> formally formally approved by ISO SC22/WG9 on January 24, 2007". Also,

"Actually" couldn't both be true?

RB states that the standard was 'published' in March 2007, AdaCore
stated 'agreed' in January 2007.

The wheels of standardization grind slowly...


> Adacore stated that they would be the first to use Ada 2005 spec in GNAT
> Pro. But, other than may be GNAT PRO license users, the official Ada GPL
> version using Ada 2005 specs was not generally available until May 4, 2008.
> Note: GNAT GPL 2007 (released in summer 2007) still defaulted to Ada 95
> specs.
>
> URL Ref. :http://www.adacore.com/2007/03/07/gnat-pro-601/
>            http://libre.adacore.com -- 2007/2008 releases
>
> But even with a typo my comment is still valid, Adacore started to insert
> Ada 2005 specs into its GPL version before January 24, 2007 and a lot of
> programmers were using Ada 2005 features, before they were approved.

And they were available on my webpage long before that (last updated
2004) but marked as for the forthcoming Ada0Y standard.

But 'so what?' - anyone using them (either mine or AdaCore's) would be
well aware they were on potentially non-portable ground. It's a
decision for them, as to where that's a problem for them or not. For
me, I wouldn't use them professionally on anything needing to be
released but would consider them for 'utility' programs if they were
going to save me time.

Also, define "a lot of" - certainly not the vast majority of
professional users, who will either a) not be using GNAT; or b) using
a specific version defined by a project at conception and quite
possibly never updated - that happens a lot.

Cheers
-- Martin



  reply	other threads:[~2009-05-05  8:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-05-01 21:39 GNAT on WinXP: System.OS_Lib.Spawn raises Program_Error daniel.wengelin
2009-05-01 21:58 ` Jeffrey R. Carter
2009-05-02  4:16 ` anon
2009-05-02 15:59   ` Martin
2009-05-02 20:39     ` anon
2009-05-02 22:01       ` Ed Falis
2009-05-02 23:20         ` anon
2009-05-03 13:24           ` Ed Falis
2009-05-04  0:22             ` anon
2009-05-04  1:21               ` Ed Falis
2009-05-03 10:33         ` sjw
2009-05-03 13:27           ` Ed Falis
2009-05-04 13:32           ` Robert A Duff
2009-05-03  9:42       ` Martin
2009-05-05  0:04       ` Randy Brukardt
2009-05-05  2:43         ` anon
2009-05-05  8:06           ` Martin [this message]
2009-05-05 23:40             ` Randy Brukardt
2009-05-02 20:31   ` daniel.wengelin
2009-05-03  2:22     ` Hang
2009-05-02  6:28 ` Example of Spawn call anon
2009-05-02 15:50   ` Hang
2009-05-02 18:28     ` anon
2009-05-02 19:38     ` sjw
2009-05-02 19:47       ` sjw
2009-05-02 20:59         ` anon
replies disabled

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox