From: "Bob Fletcher" <bob@radge.globalnet.co.uk>
Subject: Re: run-time type identification
Date: 1998/09/03
Date: 1998-09-03T00:00:00+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <01bdd742$5952e4a0$f330ea9e@ukp03332> (raw)
In-Reply-To: m367f56601.fsf@mheaney.ni.net
Don't you lose the extra values associated with the derived class though?
Maybe I'm wrong, but I thought that's what would happen.
Matthew Heaney <matthew_heaney@acm.org> wrote in article
>
> A downcast from a class-wide type nearer the root to a type (specific or
> class-wide) more away from the root is perfectly legal in Ada95. No
> Unchecked_Conversion is necessary.
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~1998-09-03 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1998-09-03 0:00 run-time type identification Bob Fletcher
1998-09-03 0:00 ` Tucker Taft
1998-09-03 0:00 ` Samuel Tardieu
1998-09-03 0:00 ` Bob Fletcher
1998-09-03 0:00 ` Matthew Heaney
1998-09-06 0:00 ` Samuel Tardieu
1998-09-03 0:00 ` Fergus Henderson
1998-09-03 0:00 ` Steve Sabljak
1998-09-03 0:00 ` Matthew Heaney
1998-09-03 0:00 ` Steve Sabljak
1998-09-03 0:00 ` Matthew Heaney
1998-09-03 0:00 ` Bob Fletcher [this message]
1998-09-03 0:00 ` Matthew Heaney
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox