From: "Nick Roberts" <Nick.Roberts@dial.pipex.com>
Subject: Re: if you ever complained about the signal/noise ratio
Date: 1998/01/16
Date: 1998-01-16T00:00:00+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <01bd22ba$53fd1bc0$5cfd82c1@xhv46.dial.pipex.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 69mc65$t5g$1@uuneo.neosoft.com
I'm all noise, I guess... ;-)
--
Nick Roberts
Croydon, UK
Proprietor, ThoughtWing Software; Independent Software Development
Consultant
* Nick.Roberts@dial.pipex.com * Voicemail & Fax +44 181-405 1124 *
*** Eats three shredded spams every morning for breakfast ***
Pat Rogers <progers@acm.org> wrote in article
<69mc65$t5g$1@uuneo.neosoft.com>...
> If you've ever complained about the signal/noise ration on c.l.a, how
about
> looking at my posted question with subject reading "statically compatible
> access discriminants in derivation"? It is pure signal... :)
>
>
> pat rogers
> progers@acm.org
next prev parent reply other threads:[~1998-01-16 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1998-01-15 0:00 if you ever complained about the signal/noise ratio Pat Rogers
1998-01-16 0:00 ` Nick Roberts [this message]
1998-01-16 0:00 ` Pat Rogers
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox