From: "Jerry van Dijk" <jvandyk@ibm.net>
Subject: Re: Question on modular types
Date: 1997/01/06
Date: 1997-01-06T00:00:00+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <01bbfbf8$4fda7a40$5f2d5c8b@jerryware> (raw)
In-Reply-To: dewar.852430006@merv
Robert Dewar <dewar@merv.cs.nyu.edu> wrote in article
<dewar.852430006@merv>...
>> "Clearly, all values are invalid, and that without inporting any
>> values from the outside world."
> No! If it is clear to you, you need your Ada prescription fixed :-)
Mmmm, I'm afraid if I asked my docter for that, I might wind up with a
totally different prescription... :-)
> A := -1;
> -1 is not a literal here, it is an expression, and the unary minus
> operator is a modular unary minus. This is a useful, intended, and
> clearly documented facility.
Yes, I found it:
4.5.4(3): For modular integer types, the unary adding operator -, when
given a nonzero operand, returns the result of subtracting
the value of the operand from the modulus; for a zero
operand, the result is zero.
type Byte is mod 256;
A_Byte : Byte;
A_Byte := -1; -- means A_Byte := Byte (Byte'Modulus - 1);
However, 4.5.4(1) mentions that all unary adding operators have their
conventional
meaning, and since the note is not technically part of the standard,
that leaves
me wondering wat that 'conventional meaning; might be. And
'conventional' to whom ?
Thanks,
Jerry.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~1997-01-06 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1997-01-04 0:00 Question on modular types Jerry van Dijk
1997-01-04 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1997-01-06 0:00 ` Jerry van Dijk [this message]
1997-01-06 0:00 ` Robert A Duff
1997-01-08 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1997-01-09 0:00 ` Tucker Taft
1997-01-11 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1997-01-12 0:00 ` Joel VanLaven
1997-01-09 0:00 ` Robert A Duff
1997-01-06 0:00 ` Joel VanLaven
1997-01-08 0:00 ` Stan and/or Jill Grimes
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox