From: Mark Lorenzen <mark.lorenzen@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: No_Implicit_Heap_Allocations
Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2011 07:38:30 -0800 (PST)
Date: 2011-01-28T07:38:30-08:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <0127a740-2d83-4690-bd96-50601a8b1feb@v16g2000vbq.googlegroups.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 8abb789c-cdbd-4cdf-9b3c-f7f9e3106bdf@f2g2000yqf.googlegroups.com
On 28 Jan., 16:19, Maciej Sobczak <see.my.homep...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Jan 28, 6:15 am, Yannick Duchêne (Hibou57)
>
> <yannick_duch...@yahoo.fr> wrote:
> > This file is commonly named “gnat.adc”, while this can be named any other
> > way. You may find more about this Configuration Pragmas File here : http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gnat_ugn_unw/The-Configuration-Pragmas-...
>
> Thank you for explanations. Indeed, a separate file dedicated for
> configuration pragmas can be very handy.
Indeed. On the project I'm working on at the moment, we plan to place
all Restriction pragmas in a common file to ensure that all units are
compiled with the same set of restrictions. Maybe it isn't strictly
necessary, but better safe than sorry.
- Mark L
prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-01-28 15:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-01-27 10:38 No_Implicit_Heap_Allocations Maciej Sobczak
2011-01-27 11:00 ` No_Implicit_Heap_Allocations Maciej Sobczak
2011-01-27 11:06 ` No_Implicit_Heap_Allocations Mark Lorenzen
2011-01-27 15:49 ` No_Implicit_Heap_Allocations Maciej Sobczak
2011-01-27 18:07 ` No_Implicit_Heap_Allocations Vinzent Hoefler
2011-01-27 22:13 ` No_Implicit_Heap_Allocations Maciej Sobczak
2011-01-28 5:15 ` No_Implicit_Heap_Allocations Yannick Duchêne (Hibou57)
2011-01-28 15:19 ` No_Implicit_Heap_Allocations Maciej Sobczak
2011-01-28 15:38 ` Mark Lorenzen [this message]
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox