From: "David Botton" <David@Botton.com>
To: <comp.lang.ada@ada.eu.org>
Subject: Re: Is JGNAT production ready?...
Date: Sun, 7 Jan 2001 09:35:45 -0500
Date: 2001-01-07T09:35:45-05:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <00ea01c078b7$212eaff0$0202a8c0@db2000> (raw)
In-Reply-To: u66jrad4u.fsf@wanadoo.fr
An important difference to note is that unlike most other Open Source
support companies, ACT has been releasing all their advances to the
community in a timely consistant manner and with out licenses that encumber
your software. It is a shame that more open source companies do not learn
from them.
David Botton
----- Original Message -----
From: "Pascal Obry" <p.obry@wanadoo.fr>
> But this has nothing to do with GNAT, ACT or whatever. The whole Open
Source
> community is working this way. GCC, GNAT, CVS, <name your tool here> have
> public version from time to time, are supported by compagnies like ACT,
> Cygnus, SourceGear and these tools have a "supported" version not yet
> available to the public (only available to the customers)...
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-01-07 14:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-01-04 1:03 Is JGNAT production ready? Andrzej Lewandowski
2001-01-04 3:08 ` Rajagopalan Srinivasan
2001-01-04 18:01 ` Andrzej Lewandowski
2001-01-04 20:42 ` Rob Veenker
2001-01-06 14:33 ` Pascal Obry
2001-01-07 2:25 ` Andrzej Lewandowski
2001-01-07 4:00 ` Robert Dewar
2001-01-07 10:08 ` Pascal Obry
2001-01-07 14:35 ` David Botton [this message]
2001-01-07 5:36 ` tmoran
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox