From: ggsub@pragmada.co.cc
Subject: Re: Why Ada isn't as successful as it should be
Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2012 16:04:57 -0700 (PDT)
Date: 2012-06-19T16:04:57-07:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <002c20b6-1ded-4fb4-8d92-6546f5892fe2@googlegroups.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <de7b6a71-0447-4e3f-9000-da6691511796@googlegroups.com>
On Monday, June 18, 2012 11:12:20 AM UTC-7, Adam Beneschan wrote:
> Maybe it isn't about the syntax, the verbosity, or the lack of text-handling support:
I guess someone needs to grow a beard and invent a "new" language (that will just happen to be identical to Ada in all but name).
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-06-19 23:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-06-18 18:12 Why Ada isn't as successful as it should be Adam Beneschan
2012-06-18 18:37 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2012-06-20 5:20 ` quiet_lad
2012-06-20 7:23 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2012-06-19 23:04 ` ggsub [this message]
2012-06-20 5:36 ` J-P. Rosen
2012-06-20 5:23 ` quiet_lad
2012-06-20 14:15 ` leonid.dulman
2012-06-20 17:48 ` Yannick Duchêne (Hibou57)
2012-06-20 18:41 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2012-06-20 20:56 ` Yannick Duchêne (Hibou57)
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox