From: jim_snead <basswoodNObaSPAM@my-deja.com.invalid>
Subject: Re: Is Apex dead as an environment for Ada & Java?
Date: 1999/11/27
Date: 1999-11-27T00:00:00+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <000b8d9b.b5931d11@usw-ex0102-014.remarq.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 01bf38cc$04d205e0$022a6282@dieppe
Another failing of the Apex subsystem notion
is how it does not fit into the other Rational product
called Rose UML. For example, given a brand new
software project I presume one could create an object
oriented model of the Ada software using Rose UML.
Rational advertises that the UML can code generate into
Ada or Java.
So here is another question to continue the thread.
How do you create an object oriented model which
spans Apex subsystems and is written using
Rational Rose UML?
Since the UML is one monolithic model, then the
generated Ada or Java must also fit into one subsystem.
If this is not the case, you risk creating a huge inverted
pyramid in your deployed design. The UML apex at the bottom
essentially supports a fan-out of subsystems, which is clearly
a maintenance nightmare.
* Sent from RemarQ http://www.remarq.com The Internet's Discussion Network *
The fastest and easiest way to search and participate in Usenet - Free!
next prev parent reply other threads:[~1999-11-27 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 66+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1999-11-26 0:00 Is Apex dead as an environment for Ada & Java? Tom_Hargraves
1999-11-26 0:00 ` jim_snead
1999-11-26 0:00 ` Steven Hovater
1999-11-26 0:00 ` jim_snead
1999-12-09 0:00 ` Wes Groleau
1999-12-12 0:00 ` jim_snead
1999-11-27 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1999-12-09 0:00 ` Henrik Delin
[not found] ` <01bf3857$22ca59a0$022a6282@dieppe>
1999-11-26 0:00 ` Ed Falis
[not found] ` <01bf38cc$04d205e0$022a6282@dieppe>
1999-11-27 0:00 ` jim_snead [this message]
1999-12-18 0:00 ` Steven Hovater
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
1999-11-26 0:00 jim_snead
1999-11-28 0:00 ` Martin Dowie
1999-11-28 0:00 ` jim_snead
1999-11-28 0:00 ` mike_zebrowski
1999-11-28 0:00 ` jim_snead
1999-11-29 0:00 ` Samuel T. Harris
1999-11-29 0:00 ` jim_snead
1999-11-29 0:00 ` John Duncan
1999-11-30 0:00 ` reason67
1999-12-01 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1999-11-30 0:00 ` John Duncan
1999-11-30 0:00 ` Samuel T. Harris
1999-11-30 0:00 ` Martin Dowie
1999-12-01 0:00 ` Aidan Skinner
1999-12-02 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1999-12-03 0:00 ` Simon Wright
1999-12-03 0:00 ` David C. Hoos, Sr.
1999-11-29 0:00 ` reason67
1999-11-29 0:00 ` jim_snead
1999-11-30 0:00 ` reason67
1999-11-30 0:00 ` jim_snead
1999-11-30 0:00 ` Martin Dowie
1999-11-30 0:00 ` Martin Dowie
1999-11-29 0:00 ` jim_snead
1999-11-30 0:00 ` Samuel T. Harris
1999-11-30 0:00 ` jim_snead
1999-12-01 0:00 ` Samuel T. Harris
1999-11-30 0:00 ` Martin Dowie
1999-11-30 0:00 ` jim_snead
1999-12-01 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1999-12-01 0:00 ` Martin Dowie
1999-12-01 0:00 ` jim_snead
1999-12-02 0:00 ` Ted Dennison
1999-12-02 0:00 ` Larry Kilgallen
1999-12-09 0:00 ` Mark Hertel
1999-12-11 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1999-12-11 0:00 ` Richard D Riehle
1999-12-11 0:00 ` Marin D. Condic
1999-12-11 0:00 ` Marin D. Condic
1999-12-11 0:00 ` Marin D. Condic
1999-12-11 0:00 ` Marin D. Condic
1999-12-02 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1999-11-30 0:00 ` Simon Wright
1999-11-30 0:00 ` jim_snead
1999-11-30 0:00 ` Tucker Taft
1999-11-30 0:00 ` jim_snead
1999-12-01 0:00 ` Larry Kilgallen
1999-12-01 0:00 ` Andreas Winckler
1999-12-01 0:00 ` jim_snead
1999-12-02 0:00 ` Samuel T. Harris
1999-12-02 0:00 ` jim_snead
1999-12-06 0:00 ` Samuel T. Harris
1999-12-18 0:00 ` Steven Hovater
1999-12-02 0:00 ` Andreas Winckler
1999-12-01 0:00 ` David W. Glessner
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox