From: jim_snead <basswoodNObaSPAM@my-deja.com.invalid>
Subject: Re: Is Apex dead as an environment for Ada & Java?
Date: 1999/11/26
Date: 1999-11-26T00:00:00+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <000b8d9b.8e8e4afb@usw-ex0107-042.remarq.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: OF58CF2558.4CE834B3-ON88256835.006A3FF1@ray.ca
In article <OF58CF2558.4CE834B3-ON88256835.006A3FF1@ray.ca>,
Tom_Hargraves@Raytheon.com wrote:
> *** We are an Ada83 project. Ada 95 may be of help here. However,
> my brain gets
> more and more taxed, the more dots I see in declarations, and
> 'renames' doesn't
> seem to help ;-)
Like I said, I don't care about Ada 83 with respect to Apex.
Apex Subsystems may be a viable option for organizing Ada 83
packages. However subsystems are useless for standard Ada 95.
According to one rationale I saw, the Ada 95 package
hierarchy was introduced as an advancement of the old
Rational R1000 (?) subsystem approach.
My hypothesis is that using a single subsystem and then using
multiple Apex "views" is all that is needed for a large Ada 95 project.
It stands to reason that the concept of a subsystem is therefore
unnecessary and outdated.
Other options are combinations of CVS, emacs, etc as others
have proposed. These sound much more effective for Ada 95
and Java development.
* Sent from RemarQ http://www.remarq.com The Internet's Discussion Network *
The fastest and easiest way to search and participate in Usenet - Free!
next prev parent reply other threads:[~1999-11-26 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 66+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1999-11-26 0:00 Is Apex dead as an environment for Ada & Java? Tom_Hargraves
1999-11-26 0:00 ` jim_snead [this message]
1999-11-26 0:00 ` Steven Hovater
1999-11-26 0:00 ` jim_snead
1999-12-09 0:00 ` Wes Groleau
1999-12-12 0:00 ` jim_snead
1999-11-27 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1999-12-09 0:00 ` Henrik Delin
[not found] ` <01bf3857$22ca59a0$022a6282@dieppe>
1999-11-26 0:00 ` Ed Falis
[not found] ` <01bf38cc$04d205e0$022a6282@dieppe>
1999-11-27 0:00 ` jim_snead
1999-12-18 0:00 ` Steven Hovater
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
1999-11-26 0:00 jim_snead
1999-11-28 0:00 ` Martin Dowie
1999-11-28 0:00 ` jim_snead
1999-11-28 0:00 ` mike_zebrowski
1999-11-28 0:00 ` jim_snead
1999-11-29 0:00 ` Samuel T. Harris
1999-11-29 0:00 ` jim_snead
1999-11-29 0:00 ` John Duncan
1999-11-30 0:00 ` reason67
1999-12-01 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1999-11-30 0:00 ` John Duncan
1999-11-30 0:00 ` Samuel T. Harris
1999-11-30 0:00 ` Martin Dowie
1999-12-01 0:00 ` Aidan Skinner
1999-12-02 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1999-12-03 0:00 ` Simon Wright
1999-12-03 0:00 ` David C. Hoos, Sr.
1999-11-29 0:00 ` reason67
1999-11-29 0:00 ` jim_snead
1999-11-30 0:00 ` Martin Dowie
1999-11-30 0:00 ` reason67
1999-11-30 0:00 ` jim_snead
1999-11-30 0:00 ` Martin Dowie
1999-11-29 0:00 ` jim_snead
1999-11-30 0:00 ` Samuel T. Harris
1999-11-30 0:00 ` jim_snead
1999-12-01 0:00 ` Samuel T. Harris
1999-11-30 0:00 ` Martin Dowie
1999-11-30 0:00 ` jim_snead
1999-12-01 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1999-12-01 0:00 ` Martin Dowie
1999-12-01 0:00 ` jim_snead
1999-12-02 0:00 ` Ted Dennison
1999-12-02 0:00 ` Larry Kilgallen
1999-12-09 0:00 ` Mark Hertel
1999-12-11 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1999-12-11 0:00 ` Richard D Riehle
1999-12-11 0:00 ` Marin D. Condic
1999-12-11 0:00 ` Marin D. Condic
1999-12-11 0:00 ` Marin D. Condic
1999-12-11 0:00 ` Marin D. Condic
1999-12-02 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1999-11-30 0:00 ` Simon Wright
1999-11-30 0:00 ` jim_snead
1999-11-30 0:00 ` Tucker Taft
1999-11-30 0:00 ` jim_snead
1999-12-01 0:00 ` Larry Kilgallen
1999-12-01 0:00 ` Andreas Winckler
1999-12-01 0:00 ` jim_snead
1999-12-02 0:00 ` Andreas Winckler
1999-12-02 0:00 ` Samuel T. Harris
1999-12-02 0:00 ` jim_snead
1999-12-06 0:00 ` Samuel T. Harris
1999-12-18 0:00 ` Steven Hovater
1999-12-01 0:00 ` David W. Glessner
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox