From: tmoran@acm.org
Subject: Re: Who said strong typing is a benefit?
Date: Sun, 13 Oct 2002 07:10:51 GMT
Date: 2002-10-13T07:10:51+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <%%8q9.21249$rz6.2550@sccrnsc02> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 8db3d6c8.0210121718.25cf55e4@posting.google.com
> write code faster in matlab than in a strongly typed language such as Ada
asdfghjkl;'
Bet you can't write code faster than dragging your finger across the
keyboard. And I could make an interpreter that did something as a
result. But the real question is not how fast you can write, but
how fast you can write a program that does what you want. Strong
typing helps do *that* fast.
As already pointed out, there's also the little matter of the difference
between weak vs strong typing and static vs dynamic typing.
> performing operations no matter what the actual data
> types turn out to be at run-time"
What does the interpreter do when you add a 3D vector to a 2D vector,
or do "if A > B" where A and B are complex, etc. I don't doubt that
it will "perform operations no matter what" - I'm just curious what
those operations might turn out to be.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-10-13 7:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-10-13 1:18 Who said strong typing is a benefit? steve_H
2002-10-13 2:53 ` Jim Rogers
2002-10-13 18:27 ` Jeffrey Carter
2002-10-13 3:24 ` Richard Riehle
2002-10-13 7:10 ` tmoran [this message]
2002-10-13 13:00 ` Jim Rogers
2002-10-13 13:30 ` Florian Weimer
2002-10-13 17:28 ` Michael Bode
2002-10-13 22:07 ` Florian Weimer
2002-10-13 19:53 ` steve_H
2002-10-13 19:31 ` steve_H
2002-10-13 15:33 ` steve_H
2002-10-13 17:14 ` Larry Kilgallen
2002-10-14 1:21 ` Dmitry A.Kazakov
2002-10-13 19:42 ` steve_H
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox