From: Kilgallen@SpamCop.net (Larry Kilgallen)
Subject: Re: Return_By_Reference or Return_By_Copy (GNAT bug?)
Date: 3 Jan 2005 22:20:33 -0600
Date: 2005-01-03T22:20:33-06:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <$xgF7TJy$z4V@eisner.encompasserve.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: H4ydndUFyuAmTUTcRVn-3A@megapath.net
In article <H4ydndUFyuAmTUTcRVn-3A@megapath.net>, "Randy Brukardt" <randy@rrsoftware.com> writes:
> "Duncan Sands" <baldrick@free.fr> wrote in message
> news:mailman.21.1104616882.527.comp.lang.ada@ada-france.org...
>> I was playing around with return by reference to see if it is possible to
>> get unserialized access to a protected variable using the Rosen trick (it
> is,
>> see example below, especially the protected object P in package C). Will
> this
>> be illegal in Ada 2005?
>
> Yes, it will.
>
> ...
> ...
>> package body B is
>>
>> The_A : A_Type;
>>
>> function Get_The_A return A_Type is
>> begin
>> return The_A;
>
> -- This return will be illegal in Ada 2005 (the return expression is not an
> aggregate or function call).
Even though nothing in that sample says protected ?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-01-04 4:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-12-31 11:07 Return_By_Reference or Return_By_Copy (GNAT bug?) Duncan Sands
2004-12-31 21:32 ` Randy Brukardt
2005-01-01 22:00 ` Duncan Sands
2005-01-03 23:11 ` Randy Brukardt
2005-01-04 4:20 ` Larry Kilgallen [this message]
2005-01-04 23:27 ` Randy Brukardt
2005-01-08 13:06 ` Duncan Sands
2005-01-10 21:05 ` Randy Brukardt
2005-03-08 16:12 ` Duncan Sands
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox