From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,38fc011071df5a27 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-06-12 23:39:37 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!logbridge.uoregon.edu!newspeer.monmouth.com!newsfeed!wn13feed!worldnet.att.net!204.127.198.203!attbi_feed3!attbi.com!sccrnsc04.POSTED!not-for-mail From: tmoran@acm.org Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Ideas for Ada 200X References: X-Newsreader: Tom's custom newsreader Message-ID: NNTP-Posting-Host: 12.234.13.56 X-Complaints-To: abuse@attbi.com X-Trace: sccrnsc04 1055486367 12.234.13.56 (Fri, 13 Jun 2003 06:39:27 GMT) NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2003 06:39:27 GMT Organization: AT&T Broadband Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2003 06:39:27 GMT Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:39081 Date: 2003-06-13T06:39:27+00:00 List-Id: >readily tell += from := needs a stronger pair of reading glasses. Is there any human being who can do a good job proofreading his own writings? It's not a question of what your eyesight + glasses allows you to see, but of what your brain allows you to notice. >it seems to me they could just as easily confuse + with *, l with 1, >or 0 with O. Which is why most programmers cringe at code that uses l or O for variable names (as in the recently posted "const L &l;").