From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 109fba,1042f393323e22da X-Google-Attributes: gid109fba,public X-Google-Thread: 103376,1042f393323e22da X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Thread: 1014db,1042f393323e22da X-Google-Attributes: gid1014db,public From: Michael Norrish Subject: Re: Any research putting c above ada? Date: 1997/05/20 Message-ID: #1/1 X-Deja-AN: 242546759 Sender: mn200@merganser.cl.cam.ac.uk References: <5le6vf$15p@bcrkh13.bnr.ca> <01bc6189$b074f500$LocalHost@xhv46.dial.pipex.com> <5li53d$irf@bcrkh13.bnr.ca> Organization: Computer Lab., University of Cambridge Newsgroups: comp.lang.c++,comp.lang.c,comp.lang.ada Date: 1997-05-20T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: jsa@alexandria (Jon S Anthony) writes: > > Where else is the theory of communicating processes (things like CSP > > and CCS by Hoare and Milner respectively) going to live except in > > computer science? > Engineering again. Other than how this works in actual software > systems, who cares? Theoretical computer scientists, that's who. Show me an engineering department that cares in the slightest about the pi calculus. I, on the other hand can show you an entire research group at the Computer Lab here that does. At a stretch you could call some of this stuff mathematics (it's abstract in the way that much of maths is abstract), but when push comes to shove, mathematicians don't do it; they're not interested. Theoretical computer science is perhaps even a branch of mathematics, but that doesn't mean maths departments do it. Michael.