From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD, FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Path: eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!mx02.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!feeder01.blueworldhosting.com!peer02.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!post02.iad.highwinds-media.com!fx20.iad.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Shark8 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; Win64; x64; rv:36.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/36.0a1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Access parameters and accessibility References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: X-Complaints-To: abuse@teranews.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2014 00:47:26 UTC Organization: TeraNews.com Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2014 17:47:22 -0700 X-Received-Bytes: 1299 X-Received-Body-CRC: 2298632906 Xref: news.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:24088 Date: 2014-12-17T17:47:22-07:00 List-Id: On 17-Dec-14 00:02, Natasha Kerensikova wrote: > Now you got me really worried, because I thouhgt access discriminants > were safe. It was under that assumption that I actually started to > really like them. Discriminants that are an access-type have exactly the scope-validity of the type, and therefore exhibit /exactly/ the "perfect fit" for accessibility. In short: use them to your heart's content.