From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,53d1d1eed63370ea
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: Ralph Paul <paul@hurricane.aem.umn.edu>
Subject: Re: compile on a pc to a sparc
Date: 1996/07/12
Message-ID: <yukwx09r49d.fsf@hurricane.aem.umn.edu>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 167988184
references: <4rrivk$naf@cville-srv.wam.umd.edu>
organization: University of Minnesota
newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1996-07-12T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


dewar@cs.nyu.edu (Robert Dewar) writes:

> And I noted the difficulties that come from the non-standard makefiles
> in OS/2. That is one of many reasons that I am personally switching
> from OS/2 to Win95, it will be much easier for me to be in a more
> standard environment gcc-wise.
> 

- What does that mean for the OS/2 support Robert ?

- Could you describe why Win95 should make life easier for you ?



Thanks,

Ralph Paul

	paul@aem.umn.edu
or	ralph@ifr.luftahrt.uni-stuttgart.de