From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,1424bffd84b8cc24,start
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: Martin Pottendorfer <Martin.Pottendorfer@aut.alcatel.at>
Subject: Ada testsuite(s) ?
Date: 1996/10/03
Message-ID: <yqyrangukha.fsf@aut.alcatel.at>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 187494457
sender: pottendo@atusel59
organization: Alcatel Austria
newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1996-10-03T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


hi,

i'm interested in a collection of ada-testprograms which could give a
feeling about the quality of an ada implementation/port.  if there is
a `standard validation suite' freely available it would be even better
...
even if such a thing is not __freely__ available i would be
interested. 

background: i've managed to build a `working' gnat crosscompiler (3.05)
for our embedded rt-os. now i'm interested how good this ada-system
approximates the ada95 standard.

thanx alot,
martin

PS: please CC to Martin.Pottendorfer@aut.alcatel.at
-- 
Martin.Pottendorfer@aut.alcatel.at
Phone: +43 1 27722 3758	|  You know you've been hacking LISP too long,
Fax:   +43 1 27722 3955	|  (if (...