From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_20,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,c2f62556e56c9683
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: rh@signal.dera.gov.uk (Roger Hoyle)
Subject: Re: 'with'ing and 'use'ing
Date: 2000/03/01
Message-ID: <yoxya83vxm8.fsf@dymock.dra.hmg.gb>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 591689517
References: <yoxzosjx5o1.fsf@dymock.dra.hmg.gb> <38BC11AB.3733FF5A@home.com>
Organization: DERA
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 2000-03-01T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


>                            My project saw this early on and allows the
> use of the "use type xxxx;" statement to circumvent the need for the
> functional notation use of operators such as ">=" etc...  The 'use type'
> statement has the effect of providing visibility to all operations on
> the type specified without haveing to resort to a general use clause on
> the entire package surrounding the type in question.  Quite handy and
> much more readable.

Oooh, that works a treat.

Thanks a lot.

cheers

rog.

(currently a happy rabbit)